RSS Feed Share on Facebook Send this to Twitter | Login Login | Register
City Independent
The Hull City Fanzine
 
Hull City Forum

Hull City Forum

Deails Post
5 posts. All posts shown

New Back To Top

candw

User Image

26500 posts
First used 09/01/17

#1
09/05/2019 at 20:47

the cladding to replace the firelighter material capitalist bastards used to up their profits!

Socialism, eh?

***For the pedantic cunt in the audience, not all of it, of course.***  

New Back To Top

theotherphantom

User Image

12832 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#2
10/05/2019 at 01:13

A good point, Batman. It could be that the cost of persuing the firelighter material capitalist bastards might be more than the cost of replacement cladding and any incidents between now and the replacement and it's about £3 or £4 each. Not, of course, the point. 

>>>>> 12th season in exile <<<<< 

New Back To Top

essexgull

8980 posts
First used 12/01/17

#3
10/05/2019 at 15:47

Over 60% or so of the buildings that qualify for the replacement cladding are council-built, via private companies, anyway. That means that along the build process, the cheaper, flammable cladding would have been signed off by a public sector procurement officer. Some of that money initially saved would have been used to pay the £150-180k a year that council leaders are earning, so very little difference from the private/capitalist sector.

The issue is no longer left v right, public v private and hasnt been for many years, despite what Corbyn v May implies. The issue is highly paid British management who aren't very good at their jobs and have been blagging it for years, in both sectors... How often do you hear of upper tier British council management losing their jobs or pensions... you couldn't even kick out a council leader who was aware of mass paedophilia and rape under his jurisdiction and allowed it to continue to stay in power, so who is going to do anything about cheap building materials.



ESSEX GULL 

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20717 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#4
11/05/2019 at 10:49

Quote Quote by essexgull on 10/05/2019 at 15:47
Over 60% or so of the buildings that qualify for the replacement cladding are council-built, via private companies, anyway. That means that along the build process, the cheaper, flammable cladding would have been signed off by a public sector procurement officer. Some of that money initially saved would have been used to pay the £150-180k a year that council leaders are earning, so very little difference from the private/capitalist sector.

The issue is no longer left v right, public v private and hasnt been for many years, despite what Corbyn v May implies. The issue is highly paid British management who aren't very good at their jobs and have been blagging it for years, in both sectors... How often do you hear of upper tier British council management losing their jobs or pensions... you couldn't even kick out a council leader who was aware of mass paedophilia and rape under his jurisdiction and allowed it to continue to stay in power, so who is going to do anything about cheap building materials.



ESSEX GULL


Do you get anything just ever so shady in the paradise that is Norway? 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20717 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#5
11/05/2019 at 10:52

Quote Quote by candw on 09/05/2019 at 20:47
the cladding to replace the firelighter material capitalist bastards used to up their profits!

Socialism, eh?

***For the pedantic cunt in the audience, not all of it, of course.***


Still getting your teachers' pension made possible because of the investment by capitalist bastards? Be glad you didn't have a pension in the good old socialist USSR, old chap. 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

5 posts. All posts shown