RSS Feed Share on Facebook Send this to Twitter | Login Login | Register
City Independent
The Hull City Fanzine
 
Hull City Forum

Hull City Forum

Deails Post
27 posts. < 1 2 > Show 15 30

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20416 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#16
14/04/2018 at 16:14

Quote Quote by candw on 14/04/2018 at 15:18
Corbyn is not a member of the IN Security Council.
Razor


So? Any answer as to why Putin is so frightened of independent evidence that he blocks independent investigations? 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

New Back To Top

Obadiah

User Image

6323 posts
First used 09/01/17

#17
14/04/2018 at 19:28

Quote Quote by Hulltim8 City AFC on 14/04/2018 at 13:06


Is that why Russia vetoes every resolution in the UN for independent enquiries, 8 to date, into their and their alles activities? One could imagine there might be a reason.

Still, one isn't needed for this latest incident. They have investigated this one themselves and found they and their allies were innocent.



Putin and Trump both block enquiries which don't suit them.

I thought the OPCW were independent and going to Syria to see if chemical weapons were used.

New Back To Top

candw

User Image

26106 posts
First used 09/01/17

#18
14/04/2018 at 19:40

Quote Quote by Hulltim8 City AFC on 14/04/2018 at 16:14


So? Any answer as to why Putin is so frightened of independent evidence that he blocks independent investigations?


It really seems to be what you do in the UN Security Council for your allies.

You know, like: US blocks UNSC statement on Israel's use of force on Land Day

New Back To Top

candw

User Image

26106 posts
First used 09/01/17

#19
14/04/2018 at 19:43

Quote Quote by Hulltim8 City AFC on 14/04/2018 at 16:14


So? Any answer as to why Putin is so frightened of independent evidence that he blocks independent investigations?


And you specifically named Corbyn while condemning the seeking of clarity over serious matters where "It seems very likely it was *****" is good enough for you.

New Back To Top

The Prince of Munster

8356 posts
First used 20/01/17

Group
Hull City

#20
14/04/2018 at 19:52

Quote Quote by candw on 12/04/2018 at 18:40
my second World War?


Depends on the definition of a world war.

I find it very unlikely Russia or the USA will directly attack one another. 

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20416 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#21
14/04/2018 at 20:31

Quote Quote by candw on 14/04/2018 at 19:43


And you specifically named Corbyn while condemning the seeking of clarity over serious matters where "It seems very likely it was *****" is good enough for you.


I actually said Corbyn types. There was a time before you were in your dotage when you would have noticed that. 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20416 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#22
14/04/2018 at 20:33

Quote Quote by The Prince of Munster on 14/04/2018 at 19:52


Depends on the definition of a world war.

I find it very unlikely Russia or the USA will directly attack one another.


A World War involves more than just 2 countries attacking each other. 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

New Back To Top

Hulltim8 City AFC

User Image

20416 posts
First used 09/01/17

Group
Hull City

#23
14/04/2018 at 20:35

Quote Quote by candw on 14/04/2018 at 19:40


It really seems to be what you do in the UN Security Council for your allies.

You know, like: US blocks UNSC statement on Israel's use of force on Land Day


Some classic whataboutery from the man who shrieks about anyone else making comparisons. 

2005 Labour got 355 seats from 35.2 % of the vote on a 62.4% turnout. 2015 Tories got 331 seats from 36.9% of the vote on a 661% turnout. Left wing fannies moan the second one is sooooo unfair and we need electoral reform. But didn't utter a peep,about the first one. 

New Back To Top

candw

User Image

26106 posts
First used 09/01/17

#24
15/04/2018 at 11:03

Quote Quote by Hulltim8 City AFC on 14/04/2018 at 20:31


I actually said Corbyn types. There was a time before you were in your dotage when you would have noticed that.


I would have thought that Corbyn was very much a Corbyn type, but carry on being silly.

And as I haven't managed to stop your whataboutery, should I not be able to join in? We are both talking about the same century this time.

New Back To Top

The Prince of Munster

8356 posts
First used 20/01/17

Group
Hull City

#25
15/04/2018 at 11:16

Quote Quote by Hulltim8 City AFC on 14/04/2018 at 20:33


A World War involves more than just 2 countries attacking each other.


I never said it did.

Though two global superpowers having a direct ruck on the cobbles will probably draw more of a crowd then say if Burkina Faso and Mali decided they wanted a scrap.

It’s far more likely that there’ll be proxy wars like Syria, where superpowers back a side of their choosing by selling whatever weapons they can...

Ivory Coast

New Back To Top

candw

User Image

26106 posts
First used 09/01/17

#26
16/04/2018 at 10:04

I wonder if we will be told how many Syrians died when our bombs breached the sites where gallons of the stuff are made and stored?  

New Back To Top

Obadiah

User Image

6323 posts
First used 09/01/17

#27
16/04/2018 at 16:26

Quote Quote by candw on 16/04/2018 at 10:04
I wonder if we will be told how many Syrians died when our bombs breached the sites where gallons of the stuff are made and stored?


We have been told, both the US and Russia said there were no reported casualties. Syria claims 3 people were hurt near Homs. if chemical weapons were produced or stored at these sites it seems strange they weren't protected by the Syrian army, or at least by a civilian caretaker.

Of course the US could have told the Russians which targets they were bombing allowing time for the sites to be evacuated. Not been a chemist I have no idea what happens to the chemical weapons if they are hit by dozens of missiles.

Here's the link to the US and Russian claims

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-ea st-43776291  

Post edited on 16/04/2018 at 16:26 by Obadiah

27 posts. < 1 2 > Show 15 30